Rampage Jackson Exposes Dana White’s Sneaky Move to End $7 Million Salary

Former UFC light heavyweight champion Rampage Jackson revisits how Dana White immediately changed his contract after $7 million payday.

Rampage Jackson Exposes Dana White’s Sneaky Move to End $7 Million Salary

Rampage Jackson reveals wild Dana White story (via MMA Mania)

🔍 Explore this post with:

ChatGPTPerplexityGrok AIGoogle AI

Rampage Jackson is widely regarded as one of the most successful former UFC fighters to leverage opportunities after retirement. His move into streaming has kept him visible and connected him with high-profile internet personalities across multiple platforms. That was evident when Jackson was recently seen with Adin Ross, discussing how UFC CEO Dana White changed his contract without his knowledge.

Jackson’s bout against Chuck Liddell at UFC 71 served as a rematch of their 2003 meeting in PRIDE, where Jackson also emerged victorious. He again defeated Liddell in the UFC, capturing the title in the process. Jackson has frequently referenced earning roughly $7 million from their second encounter following the WEC-UFC merger. That figure was primarily generated through pay-per-view revenue.

The former light heavyweight champion has grown into a regular presence across influencer streams and creator-led events. His visibility now extends into boxing shows tied to major online personalities. He recently attended Brand Risk Promotion’s No. 12 card, an influencer boxing promotion owned by Ross. While on the commentary team with Ross, Jackson outlined White’s direct role in altering his contract.

Dana doesn’t like to pay what they are worth. When they found out I made that type of money ($7 million), they changed my contract without me knowing. They bought my contract over from another promotion (WEC).

Rampage Jackson via Kick

Jackson’s relationship with the UFC CEO has been turbulent throughout his career and retirement. He has previously stated that his dealings with White contributed to a gradual loss of passion for fighting. At the same time, Jackson has also acknowledged moments where White supported him during difficult periods. Despite their disputes, Jackson has consistently expressed respect for White’s role in his life and career.

Despite the contract controversy, Jackson has said his streaming income has exceeded what he earned across his two-decade MMA career. His online presence has become his primary business focus in retirement. Jackson has around 189,000 followers on Kick and also runs the JAXXON Podcast, which has roughly 311,000 YouTube subscribers. His content often centers on travel and collaborations.

Dana White continues to face increased scrutiny from the MMA community over fighter pay and restrictive contract structures. Ongoing debates over revenue sharing have kept compensation practices in the spotlight. Against that backdrop, Rampage Jackson’s comments carry added weight given his championship status and long tenure in the UFC, and reinforce why pay equity remains a central issue.

Fans react to Rampage Jackson’s comments about Dana White changing his contract

Rampage Jackson’s comments sparked anger among many fans, who viewed the situation as further evidence of long-standing pay issues in the UFC. The revelation intensified criticism toward Dana White and the promotion’s compensation model. Fans argued that top fighters were often underpaid relative to the revenue they generated. The reaction reflected broader frustration over what fighters are worth.

Rampage Jackson
Rampage Jackson (via BJ Penn)

Other fans framed the situation as a calculated business decision rather than misconduct. They argued that allowing individual fighters to earn sums that large could have created long-term financial strain on the promotion. From that perspective, White’s approach was seen as protecting the UFC’s overall business model. Supporters of this view emphasized sustainability over individual payouts.

A portion of fans also directed criticism toward Jackson himself, suggesting he has repeated the story multiple times to stay relevant. Some questioned the timing of the renewed comments and the platform on which they were shared. Others asked why Rampage Jackson did not pursue legal action when the alleged contract changes occurred. Those reactions reflected skepticism alongside the broader debate.

Also Read: