Former Wimbledon champion says Jannik Sinner ‘more difficult’ to beat than Pete Sampras as the Italian has ‘no weaknesses’
Richard Krajicek, who has defeated Pete Sampras six times, thinks World No.1 Jannik Sinner is a complete player.
Jannik Sinner, Pete Sampras (Images via X, Tennis.com)
Jannik Sinner arguably is the most successful player in men’s tennis this season. With seven titles in his trophy cabinet, Sinner is also the most consistent player. Rotterdam Open tournament director Richard Krajicek recently compared him with legend Pete Sampras.
Despite Sampras’s great career, Krajicek has a 6-4 head-to-head record against him. But according to Krajicek, it was easier to guess players’ weaknesses during his playing days, as he revealed Sampras’ one ‘weakness’.
Krajicek, who won Wimbledon in 1996, however, is happy to have played in the 90s because. According to him, most of the current players are complete, while in the 90s’, even the best had weaknesses, which gave him the confidence to beat the top players.
Angelo Binaghi says only idiots doubt Jannik Sinner’s innocence
The Court of Arbitration of Sport (CAS) is yet to issue a verdict on Jannik Sinner‘s doping case after the World Anti-Doping Agency demanded a ban on the Italian.
Although the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) acquitted Sinner of all charges, there are still some who think Sinner had intentionally contaminated himself. President of the Italian tennis federation, Angelo Binaghi, called those people idiots as he once again backed Sinner.
Sinner is in Turin for the ATP Finals and is set to lock horns with Daniil Medvedev in his third group-stage match. He has already won his previous two matches against Alex de Minaur and Taylor Fritz and a win over Medvedev will take him to the last four. Medvedev, on the other hand, has lost the first match he played against Fritz but breezed past De Minaur.
Gouri Das
(4695 Articles Published)