Tiger Woods denies “Oral Tenancy Agreement” with ex-girlfriend Erica Herman
Tiger Woods' legal battle with ex-girlfriend over alleged "oral tenancy agreement"
Follow Us
Erica Herman and Tiger Woods ( Image via Golfdigest )
Tiger Woods, the legendary golf player, is denying claims made by his ex-girlfriend Erica Herman that they had an “oral tenancy agreement” which ensured that she could live in his Florida mansion for 11 years.
In legal documents obtained by ET, Woods’ trust responded to Herman’s claim that she still had five years remaining on their agreement when they split in October and, therefore, is entitled to $30 million in compensation. Woods’ lawyers have countered these claims by stating that there was never a written or oral tenancy agreement between Woods or the Trust.
During their relationship, Woods’ lawyers argue that he invited Herman to live with him as his guest in his residence. However, after breaking off their relationship, Woods notified Herman that she was no longer welcome in his house. Instead, he arranged for her to stay at a local luxury resort and provided funds that she could use towards a new residence.
The news of these legal battles has come as a surprise to many of Woods’ fans and admirers, who have been eagerly following his career on the golf course. Woods’ personal life has been the subject of media scrutiny for many years, and this latest development is just the latest in a long line of controversies. Many have expressed their disappointment at the way the situation has unfolded, and some have even questioned Woods’ judgment in getting involved with Herman in the first place.
Related: Jon Rahm withdraws from Players Championship due to illness
Tiger Woods’ defense of good faith
Tiger Woods’ lawyers have provided a strong defense against Erica Herman’s claims, stating that there was never any agreement between the two parties regarding Herman’s living arrangements. The legal documents state that Woods never negotiated an oral tenancy agreement with Herman, nor was there ever a written agreement between the two.
Furthermore, Woods’ lawyers argue that he acted in good faith by providing Herman with alternative accommodation and financial assistance to help her find a new residence. This, they claim, shows that Woods acted in a responsible and ethical manner in his dealings with Herman, even after their relationship ended.
The legal battle between Woods and Herman continues to attract attention from fans and media alike. While the outcome of this dispute is yet to be determined, it is clear that Woods’ lawyers have provided a strong defense against Herman’s claims. Whatever the final outcome may be, it is clear that this latest controversy has once again cast a shadow over Woods’ personal life and has left many of his fans feeling disappointed and let down.
In case you missed it:
Nick Watney’s careless putts on 17th hole haunt him in opening round of Players Championship
/techfirstnow/media/agency_attachments/kATjCXskQdJKkXN0OuqW.png)