Martina Navratilova calls $38,000,000 worth Jake Paul a ‘mediocre boxer’ after he comments in support of Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy

Jake Paul has been advocating his young-adult audience to vote for Vivek.


Martina Navratilova calls $38,000,000 worth Jake Paul a ‘mediocre boxer’ after he comments in support of Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy

Martina Navratilova and Jake Paul. (Credits: People and Marca)

Martina Navratilova is known for her outspoken nature and never ‘held back’ attitude. Several popular names have been on the receiving end of Navratilova’s thorny jibes. The former pro has faced immense backlash because of her opinions, in the past, but this has never stopped her from always being armed with sarcasm to deal with people she does not agree with. Now, she has taken a jibe at YouTuber turned-boxer Jake Paul.

Recently, Paul, a well-known social media ‘influencer’ came up on his socials to aware the American youth regarding the upcoming presidential elections. He seemed to have a lot of good words for Indian-origin presidential candidate, Vivek Ramaswamy, who is most likely to run for a presidential ship from the Republican side.

YouTube video

Jake Paul has been advocating for Vivek by asking his fans to vote for Vivek. However, most of his fans are mostly from the age group 18-28. Consequently, a Twitter user by the name of Matt Binder responded to Paul’s post and wrote, “Jake Paul you d*mb sh*t! Vivek doesn’t even want 18-24-year-olds to be able to vote.”

FS Video

Meanwhile, Navratilova hopped on the bandwagon and attacked Paul by calling him a ‘mediocre’ boxer. She posted, “Just googled- no wonder I never heard of him- a mediocre boxer at best.” This is not the first time she has expressed her disappointment at the Republican party and its candidates. Just a few days ago she lashed at former US President Donald Trump.

Read more: Serena Williams already finding parenting two kids difficult as she pays ‘mad respect’ to other parents

Navratilova criticizes former President Donald Trump

Recently, journalist David Pepper shared a video with a thought-provoking title that struck a chord with many Americans. Pepper stated, “Easy to forget that two decades ago, there were no states with photo-ID laws, (and no issue of in-person voter fraud) Now they’re everywhere. It’s a case study of how suppression sets in to battle a myth.”

Martina Navratilova and Donald Trump.
Martina Navratilova and Donald Trump. (Credits: Tennis Threads Magazine, The Hill)

According to the video, Until 2005, Americans did not need a photo ID to vote in legislative elections. This finding sparked a broader discussion regarding the evolution of voter ID laws throughout time.

Meanwhile, Martina Navratilova retweeted the journalist’s remark on her own account and took a chance to attack Trump referring to him as the ‘orange person.’ “The orange guy has tried to torpedo everything. Education, postal service, FBI, voting, our military, etc. And it has worked.”

As Navratilova’s tweet received a lot of attention and discussion, it rapidly went viral on social media. Many Americans participated in the debate as well. Some even expressed their perspectives on the growth of voter ID legislation and the influence of political leaders on many elements of governance. (Read the entire article here)

Discover more: