Paddy Pimblett Makes Vile Statement About Dan Hooker’s Mother Amidst Trash Talk
#6 lightweight contender Dan Hooker catches major stray during Paddy Pimblett's analysis of his upcoming UFC 324 bout.
Paddy Pimblett makes morbid comments towards Dan Hooker (via Instagram, MMA Mania)
🔍 Explore this post with:
Paddy Pimblett has risen through the UFC lightweight ranks with dominant performances and a flashy persona that have made him a marketable star. His style and confident presence have consistently drawn attention. Pimblett is also known for trash talk and commentary that generate headlines. That approach was in full flow recently when he targeted fellow lightweight Dan Hooker with personal remarks.
Pimblett’s rise has been accelerated by high-profile victories over established names, including Tony Ferguson and King Green. His most recent Octagon appearance came at UFC 314, where he secured a knockout win over Michael Chandler. That result further strengthened his standing in the 155-pound division. The Liverpudlian is now scheduled to face Justin Gaethje for the interim title at UFC 324.
After the UFC 314 victory, Pimblett saw a sharp rise in the lightweight rankings over the following months, moving from eighth to fifth. The climb came despite fewer recent Octagon appearances than other contenders. The shift prompted criticism from several fighters in the division, including Hooker. That context framed Pimblett’s recent shot at Hooker while addressing concerns about Gaethje’s current form.
People are saying like Justin Gaethje’s old and that. Lad, he is two years older than Dan Hooker. Dan Hooker could not grapple a f*****g rap*st off his mom. You know what I mean?
Paddy Pimblett via The MMA Guru interview
🗣️ Paddy Pimblett:
— Championship Rounds (@ChampRDS) January 9, 2026
"Dan Hooker couldn't grapple a r*pist off his mom." 🤨
(via @THATBOYMMAGURU) pic.twitter.com/NpLhVjQgca
The rivalry between Pimblett and Hooker traces back to comments made by Hooker questioning Pimblett’s rapid rise in the lightweight division. The New Zealand native publicly criticized the quality of Pimblett’s opposition and suggested his ranking position was inflated. He also implied that Pimblett had not yet proven himself against elite competition, and his remarks laid the groundwork for their tension.
Pimblett had previously identified Hooker as a potential future opponent in the UFC lightweight division. He referenced Hooker’s performance and standing following his UFC 305 appearance. That fight ended in a split decision victory for Hooker against Mateusz Gamrot. At the time, Pimblett viewed The Hangman’s results and ranking as factors that made the matchup competitively relevant.
Pimblett’s recent remark aimed at Dan Hooker stood out for its absurdity and vileness. Paddy Pimblett is widely known for his trash talk and a strong online presence, which often fuels his popularity. However, the comment directed at the New Zealand natives family differed sharply from the tone he usually adopts.
It went beyond his typical promotional rhetoric and into territory rarely associated with his past exchanges. Some have theorized that saying vile stuffs closer to fight night would generate impressions and interest on social media. So far, Pimblett has achieved that and an intense beef with the New Zealand native may be brewing.
Dan Hooker replies to Paddy Pimblett’s comments
Dan Hooker has been an active figure in the UFC lightweight division for several years, known for high-level striking and durable performances. He is now regarded as a gatekeeper of the 155-pound class, testing rising contenders on their way up. Hooker maintains a strong online presence and is unafraid to engage in confrontations. His social media activity often mirrors his in-cage intensity and mindset.

Paddy Pimblett is known to fluctuate his weight between fights, often gaining significant mass during off-training periods. That pattern has been widely observed throughout his career and affects public perception of his readiness. Hooker leveraged this aspect as part of a pointed response to Pimblett’s recent comments. The exchange highlighted how fighters use personal traits as ammunition.
It’s on site u fat b**ch.
Dan Hooker via X
It’s on site u fat bitch. pic.twitter.com/Izud4CCSNi
— Dan Hangman Hooker (@danthehangman) January 9, 2026
In the UFC and combat sports more broadly, fighters often use public platforms to defend themselves or their loved ones when confronted with disparaging comments. Hooker’s reply illustrates how personal attacks outside the Octagon can provoke immediate, fact-based responses grounded in protecting reputation and family.
Also Read:
- Fans React to Dana White Citing Headbutt as Reason for Arman Tsarukyan’s UFC 324 Title Shot Snub
- “Lasted 3 Business Days” – Internet Shocked as Alex Pereira Announces Breakup With Tracy Cortez